On this page
- Conceptual Clarity
- Maratha Background & Shahji Bhonsle
- Shivaji Raje Bhonsle (1627–1680)
- Treaty of Purandar & Agra Episode
- Shivaji's Administration (Ashtapradhan, Revenue, Military)
- Sambhaji, Rajaram & Tarabai (1681–1707)
- Shahu & Rise of the Peshwas (1707–1740)
- The Peshwa Era (1720–1818) & Maratha Confederacy
- Third Battle of Panipat (1761)
- Maratha Administration (detailed)
- Post-Mughal Regional States I: Bengal, Awadh, Punjab
- Post-Mughal Regional States II: Rajputana, Gujarat, Malwa, Kashmir, Assam, Orissa
- Post-Mughal Regional States III: Southern India — Mysore & Travancore
- Significance & Legacy of 18th Century India
- Current Affairs Link
- Previous Year Questions
- Quick Revision Box
Why Marathas & 18th Century India Matter for UPSC
The Maratha polity (1674–1818) is one of the most complex and high-yield topics in UPSC Medieval/Modern History. Three reasons it bridges periods: (1) The Marathas represent the only serious pan-Indian challenge to Mughal decline; understanding their rise, peak, and fall explains WHY the British could establish empire; (2) The regional successor states (Bengal, Awadh, Mysore) are the entities that the East India Company defeated one by one — this is directly tested in Modern History; (3) Both Shivaji's administration (Ashtapradhan, Chauth, Sardeshmukhi) and the Peshwa system appear directly in UPSC Prelims almost every year.
- Prelims: ~2–3 questions per year — Maratha administration, Chauth, Peshwas, Panipat III, regional states are all recurring.
- Mains GS-I: 1–2 questions almost every year — Shivaji's administration, Panipat III causes, regional successor states.
- Strategy: Master Shivaji's administration, Peshwa chronology, Panipat III causes/consequences, and the five major regional states — these nodes cover 80% of UPSC questions on this topic.
1. Maratha Background & Shahji Bhonsle
Geographical & Social Foundation
- Western Deccan — Sahyadri (Western Ghats) terrain: narrow valleys, dense forests, hill forts; ideal for guerrilla warfare against numerically superior forces
- Maratha society: peasant-warrior class (Kunbi caste base); deeply religious, connected to the Varkari Bhakti tradition — Tukaram, Eknath, Ramdas Swami
- Bhakti Movement connection: Ramdas Swami (1608–1681) — Shivaji's spiritual guide; wrote Dasbodh; developed the concept of "Swaraj" (self-rule) as a religious duty
- Language: Marathi; scripture: Dnyaneshwari (1290 CE, Jnaneshwar); administrative language: Marathi written in Modi script
Shahji Bhonsle (c.1594–1664)
- Father of Shivaji; jagirdar under Bijapur Adil Shah (later) and briefly under the Nizam Shahis
- Attempted to set up an independent kingdom in the Deccan (1630s) — failed; had to submit to Bijapur
- Held jagir of Poona and Supa; assigned these to Shivaji (son) under guardianship of Dadaji Kondadev
- Also served Bijapur in Karnataka — maintained parallel power base in south (Bangalore/Kolar jagir)
- Significance: Shahji gave Shivaji the base of Poona jagir + military resources + political contacts that made the Maratha rise possible
2. Shivaji Raje Bhonsle (1627–1680)
Early Conquests — Chronological Table
| Year | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1646 | Seized Torna fort from Bijapur | First independent military action; used fort revenue to build more forts |
| 1647 | Captured Rajgad, Kondana (Sinhagad) | Establishing ring of forts around Poona |
| 1656–59 | Seized Javali from More chiefs; Pratapgad fort built | Secured Konkan approaches; base for anti-Bijapur operations |
| 1659 | Killed Afzal Khan at Pratapgad | Bijapur's top general; Shivaji used wagh nakh (tiger claws) in famous face-to-face meeting |
| 1660 | Night raid on Shaista Khan at Poona | Mughal governor humiliated; Shivaji cut Shaista Khan's finger; restored Maratha morale |
| 1664 | First Sack of Surat | Looted Mughal port; tribute to Maratha power |
| 1665 | Treaty of Purandar with Jai Singh | Ceded 23 forts; retained 12; Sambhaji given 5,000 mansab; tactical retreat |
| 1666 | Agra escape | Aurangzeb confined Shivaji; escaped disguised (sweet-basket legend); declared independence |
| 1670 | Second sack of Surat | Even richer haul; recovered many forts from Mughals |
| 1674 | Coronation at Raigad | Rajyabhisheka as Chhatrapati; Gaga Bhatt certified Kshatriya lineage |
| 1676–80 | Southern campaigns | Expanded into Karnataka (Tanjore, Gingee, Vellore) |
| 1680 | Death at Raigad | Age ~52; disputed succession followed |
Guerrilla Warfare — Ganimi Kava
- Hit-and-run tactics exploiting Sahyadri terrain — ambushes, night raids, cutting enemy supply lines
- Rapid cavalry mobility (Maratha horse: light, fast, no heavy armour)
- Fort network as defensive infrastructure — over 300 forts eventually controlled
- Avoided pitched battle against superior numbers; used terrain as a force multiplier
- Intelligence network: Bahirkila (external spies) and Antar-kila (internal spies)
Military Forces
- Infantry (Mavalas): hill peasant soldiers; fiercely loyal; formed backbone of early army
- Cavalry — two types: (1) Bargirs — state cavalry, horses supplied by state (prevented noble over-dependence); (2) Shiledars — private cavalry, own horses
- Navy: Shivaji built navy from scratch — Sindhudurg fort (island fort); Maratha navy protected Konkan coast; later expanded under Kanhoji Angre
- Artillery: maintained though less emphasis than Mughal armies; adopted when necessary
3. Treaty of Purandar & Agra Episode
Treaty of Purandar (1665)
- Negotiated between Shivaji and Raja Jai Singh (Mirza Raja, Amber) — Mughal commander sent by Aurangzeb
- Terms:
- Shivaji surrendered 23 forts (out of 35) to Mughals; retained 12 forts (including Raigad)
- Shivaji's son Sambhaji given Mughal mansab of 5,000
- Shivaji to provide 5,000 cavalry for Mughal service
- Shivaji to visit Aurangzeb's court at Agra
- Context: Jai Singh's military pressure was overwhelming; tactical retreat by Shivaji; never intended permanent submission — resumed campaigns once free
Agra Incident (1666)
- Shivaji visited Aurangzeb's court at Agra (May 1666)
- Placed in 5,000 zat mansab (same as minor chiefs) — humiliating for someone who styled himself Chhatrapati
- Protested; placed under house arrest at Mirza Raja's mansion
- Escape: Shivaji feigned illness; sent out baskets of sweets/fruits (the "sweet-basket legend"); escaped with Sambhaji; disguised as saints/traders; returned to Deccan
- Declared independence; repudiated Treaty of Purandar
- 1668: Formal truce with Mughals — Aurangzeb recognised Shivaji as Raja (temporary tactical peace)
- 1670: Resumed campaigns; second sack of Surat; recovered many forts
Coronation at Raigad (June 1674)
- Rajyabhisheka (Hindu coronation ceremony) — first independent Hindu coronation in the Deccan in centuries
- Gaga Bhatt of Benares: certified Shivaji's Kshatriya lineage (Bhonsle clan = Rajput origin claimed)
- Tantric second coronation held for those who questioned the first ceremony's validity
- Titles taken: Chhatrapati, Shakakarta ("founder of an era"), Haindava Dharmoddharaka ("upholder of Hindu dharma"), Kshatriya Kulavantas
- Significance: Symbolically challenged Mughal suzerainty; legitimised Maratha rule; gave the polity a formal constitutional identity
4. Shivaji's Administration
Ashtapradhan (Eight-Minister Council)
| Minister | Title | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Peshwa | Prime Minister | Overall administration; head of council |
| Amatya/Majumdar | Finance Minister | Revenue and accounts |
| Mantri/Waqia-navis | Home Secretary | Daily records; chronicle of events |
| Sachiv/Shyurnavis | Correspondence Secretary | Royal letters; farmans |
| Sumant/Dabir | Foreign Secretary | Diplomatic relations; treaties |
| Senapati/Sar-i-Naubat | Commander-in-Chief | Military command |
| Nyayadhish | Chief Justice | Civil and criminal justice |
| Panditrao | Head of Ecclesiastical Affairs | Religious grants; charities; Brahmin welfare |
Revenue System
- Abolished tax-farming (zamindari over tax collection) — direct state-peasant relationship
- Chauth: 1/4th of the assessed revenue of neighbouring territories — collected as military tribute/protection money from territories NOT under direct Maratha rule (Mughal, Bijapur, Nizam territories)
- Sardeshmukhi: Additional 10% levy — claimed as hereditary right of the Maratha chief as Sardeshmukh (headman of Maharashtra)
- Combined: Chauth + Sardeshmukhi = 35% of assessed revenue taken from external territories WITHOUT administering them — a major income source without administrative burden
- Direct territories: Patta system; revenue surveys conducted; Marathi replacing Persian in records (vernacularisation)
- Currency: gold Hon/pagoda; copper Shivrai paisa
Military Administration
- Standing army paid in cash — NOT jagirs; prevented noble over-independence
- Bargir cavalry (state-owned horses) — structural check on noble power
- Fort administration: each fort had three separate commandants (Havaldar, Sabnis, Sarnobat) — no single person could betray it; checks and balances built into the system
- Strict discipline: no looting of civilians during campaigns; women prisoners treated respectfully (famously returned widow of enemy chief with honour and guards)
Judicial System
- Based on Dharmashastra; Shivaji personally heard petitions on designated days
- Local panchayats retained for village-level disputes
- Justice emphasised as a royal duty — "Shivaji never punished the innocent"
5. Sambhaji, Rajaram & Tarabai (1681–1707)
Sambhaji (1681–1689)
- Shivaji's elder son; succeeded after disputed succession with younger son Rajaram
- Brilliant military record (13 years of continuous war against Aurangzeb's massive Deccan campaign) but portrayed as erratic by hostile sources
- Gave shelter to Akbar (Aurangzeb's rebellious son) — gave Aurangzeb added justification to destroy Marathas
- Expanded south: Chikka Deva Raya (Mysore) alliance; Goa siege (vs. Portuguese)
- Captured by Mughal general Mukarrab Khan (Sangameshwar, February 1689) — betrayed by Ganoji Shirke (his wife's relative)
- Execution: Aurangzeb had Sambhaji publicly paraded, tortured, dismembered, and killed (March 1689) — became a Maratha martyr; hardened resistance across the Deccan
- Significance: His death galvanised every Maratha chief; Aurangzeb's most brutal act proved strategically counterproductive
Rajaram (1689–1700)
- Younger son of Shivaji; escaped to Gingee (Tamil Nadu) after Sambhaji's death
- Held out at Gingee fort for 8 years (1689–1698) while Mughals besieged it
- Tarabai (his chief consort) proved the actual military brain behind Maratha resistance
- Rajaram died 1700; Tarabai carried on as regent for infant son Shivaji II
Tarabai — Regent (1700–1707)
- Rajaram's chief consort; conducted war against Aurangzeb's massive Deccan campaign with genius
- Marathas simultaneously held dozens of forts AND raided Mughal supply lines — Aurangzeb could not subdue both simultaneously
- Aurangzeb spent 1681–1707 (26 years) in the Deccan without subduing the Marathas — died in Ahmednagar 1707
- After Shahu returned (1707), Tarabai contested regency — Kolhapur line (Tarabai/Rajaram's descendants) maintained separately
Shahu (1707–1749)
- Sambhaji's son; captured by Mughals in 1689 as a child; released by Bahadur Shah I (1707) after Aurangzeb's death — a deliberate strategy to divide Marathas
- Conflict with Tarabai; victory at Battle of Khed 1707 — Shahu established as Chhatrapati at Satara
- Power progressively devolved to Peshwas; Shahu himself became largely ceremonial
- Split: Satara (Shahu's line) vs Kolhapur (Tarabai/Rajaram's line) — two competing Maratha thrones
6. Shahu & Rise of the Peshwas (1707–1740)
Balaji Vishwanath Bhatt — First Powerful Peshwa (1713–1720)
- From Chitpavan Brahmin family (Konkan coastal Brahmins)
- Helped Shahu consolidate against rivals; rewarded with Peshwaship (1713)
- Key achievement — Treaty with Sayyid Brothers (1719): Negotiated Maratha terms for supporting Abdullah Khan and Hussain Ali in their conflict with Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar; Marathas received:
- Right to collect Chauth and Sardeshmukhi from all six Deccan provinces (subas)
- Release of Shahu's family members held by Mughals since 1689
- Formal recognition of Shahu as Chhatrapati
- Peshwaship made hereditary in Bhatt family — the single most important constitutional development in Maratha history after Shivaji's coronation
- Died 1720; succeeded by son Baji Rao I
Baji Rao I (1720–1740) — "The Greatest Peshwa"
- Famous declaration: "Let us strike at the trunk of the withering tree (Mughal empire) and the branches will fall of themselves"
- Never lost a battle in 41 campaigns — the most consistent military record in Indian history
- Key campaigns:
- Malwa (1723–24): Extended Maratha influence into Madhya Pradesh; defeated Nizam-ul-Mulk
- Gujarat (1730s): Multiple campaigns; Gaekwad family established as Maratha agents in Gujarat
- Bundelkhand (1728): Chhatrasal Bundela alliance; received Jhansi/Orchha area as territory; Mastani was Chhatrasal's daughter (Muslim/Rajput ancestry)
- Battle of Bhopal (1737): Defeated Mughal forces near Delhi — Marathas appeared at gates of Delhi; Nizam-ul-Mulk of Hyderabad (commanding Mughal forces) signed Treaty of Bhopal ceding Malwa and Rs 50 lakh indemnity
- Personal life: Mastani controversy — Brahmin orthodoxy opposed his relationship with Mastani; their son Shamsher Bahadur
- Died 1740 at Raver (near Khandwa) — possibly from exhaustion; age 39
- Significance: Transformed Marathas from Deccan regional power to North Indian imperial aspirant; the Peshwa became the real empire-builder
7. The Peshwa Era & Maratha Confederacy (1740–1818)
Balaji Baji Rao I / Nana Sahib (1740–1761)
- Expanded Maratha reach to its maximum geographic extent:
- Bengal (1741–42): Maratha raid reached Bengal; Nawab Alivardi Khan built the "Maratha Ditch" (Alinagar trench around Calcutta) in fear; collected Chauth from Bengal
- Punjab (1758): Raghunath Rao expelled Ahmad Shah Abdali's representative; Marathas reached Attock on the Indus — maximum northern extent
- Delhi became a Maratha protectorate de facto
- Organized the Panipat III expedition: 50,000 soldiers (with wives/camp followers ~150,000 total) — a fatal strategic error
- Died of grief after Panipat III (June 1761) — "The sun has set"
The Maratha Confederacy — Five Houses
| House | Family | Territory | Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peshwa | Bhatt (Chitpavan Brahmin) | Maharashtra/Poona | Poona |
| Sindhia (Scindia) | Ranoji Sindhia → Mahadji Sindhia | Gwalior/Malwa/North India | Gwalior |
| Holkar | Malhar Rao Holkar → Ahilyabai Holkar | Indore/Malwa | Indore |
| Bhonsle of Nagpur | Raghuji Bhonsle | Nagpur/Berar/Orissa | Nagpur |
| Gaekwad | Damaji Gaekwad | Baroda/Gujarat | Baroda |
Key Post-Panipat Figures
- Mahadji Sindhia (1761–1794): Greatest post-Panipat Maratha figure; rebuilt Maratha power in North India; controlled Delhi; made Shah Alam II his pensioner; built Western-trained army with help of Benoit de Boigne (French soldier of fortune) — "Brigade System"; fought all three Anglo-Maratha wars
- Ahilyabai Holkar (1765–1795): One of India's greatest rulers; administered Malwa from Indore; built/restored temples across India (Kashi Vishwanath, Somnath, Gaya, Dwarka); model welfare administration; still revered as "Punyashloki" (holy sovereign) in Maharashtra
- Madhav Rao I (1761–1772): "Saviour of the Marathas" — rebuilt empire after Panipat III catastrophe; defeated Hyder Ali; brought Rajputs/Jats back under Maratha influence; revived Maratha prestige in North India; died of tuberculosis 1772 aged 27 — greatest loss to Marathas
Later Peshwas — Decline
- Raghunath Rao ("Raghoba"): Conspired to become Peshwa; allegedly caused murder of own nephew Narayan Rao (1773); Treaty of Surat (1775) with British — invited British to help claim Peshwaship — First Anglo-Maratha War (1775–82)
- Sawai Madhav Rao (1774–95): Child Peshwa under regents; committed suicide 1795
- Baji Rao II (1796–1818): Weak, treacherous; Treaty of Bassein (1802) — accepted British subsidiary alliance; humiliation; Maratha chiefs refused to accept his capitulation; Second Anglo-Maratha War (1803–05); Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817–18) — Baji Rao II defeated; Peshwaship abolished 1818
Anglo-Maratha Wars
| War | Period | Key Event/Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| First | 1775–1782 | Treaty of Salbai (1782) — status quo; Raghoba abandoned by British |
| Second | 1803–1805 | Delhi and Mughals effectively under British; Sindhia ceded territories; Wellesley's victory |
| Third | 1817–1818 | Final defeat; Peshwaship abolished; Baji Rao II pensioned off; territories absorbed into Bombay Presidency |
8. Third Battle of Panipat (14 January 1761)
Background
- By 1758, Marathas controlled Delhi and Punjab — direct challenge to Afghan Durrani Empire
- Ahmad Shah Abdali (Durrani Empire, Kandahar) had been raiding India repeatedly since 1748; Marathas expelled his governor from Punjab in 1758
- Alliance against Marathas: Abdali + Rohilla Afghans (Najib-ud-Daula) + Nawab of Awadh (Shuja-ud-Daula)
- Marathas isolated: Jats (Suraj Mal of Bharatpur withdrew troops after a dispute), Rajputs (refused to help), Awadh (joined Abdali), Nizam (neutral) — Maratha arrogance during expansion had alienated all potential allies
- Maratha commanders: Vishwas Rao (son of Peshwa Nana Sahib) and Sadashiv Rao Bhau ("Bhau Sahib," Vishwas Rao's uncle)
The Campaign (July 1760–January 1761)
- Marathas entered Delhi July 1760; cut off from Deccan supply lines
- Six months standoff at Panipat: Marathas and Abdali camped facing each other; critical food shortage for Marathas
- Battle Date: 14 January 1761 (Makar Sankranti — auspicious date chosen by Marathas)
The Battle
- Maratha force: ~50,000 troops; Abdali's force: ~40,000–45,000 (Afghan cavalry + camel-mounted swivel guns)
- The fatal moment: Vishwas Rao (Peshwa's heir) shot dead by musket ball early in battle; Bhau Sahib rode his elephant to confirm — troops saw his elephant without the howdah → assumed both commanders dead → broke ranks and fled
- Bhau Sahib's body never found; Vishwas Rao killed; 28,000–40,000 Marathas killed; many captured and massacred
- 28 Maratha generals died in the battle
Consequences
- Immediate: Peshwa Balaji Baji Rao (Nana Sahib) died of grief (June 1761) — "The sun of the Marathas has set over the plains of Panipat"
- Maratha dominance over North India shattered — the Marathas never regained strategic initiative in the north
- Power vacuum in North India → East India Company accelerated expansion from Bengal westward
- Marathas recovered under Madhav Rao I by the 1770s — Panipat III was NOT the end of Marathas; only the end of North Indian ambitions
- Ahmad Shah Abdali himself left India permanently — his Durrani Empire too fragile to hold Indian territory; last major Afghan invasion of India
- Long-term: no Indian power could now check the British from the north and east simultaneously
Why Marathas Lost
- Supply crisis (6-month standoff depleted food for 150,000 people + cavalry)
- Alienated all potential allies through arrogant expansion policy — fought alone
- Lack of unified command; Bhau-Vishwas Rao leadership duo inexperienced vs Abdali's veteran Durrani cavalry
- Afghan cavalry superior in open plains of Panipat (unlike Deccan hill warfare that Marathas excelled at)
- No contingency plan for loss of commanders mid-battle
- Bringing camp followers (women, pilgrims) created logistical nightmare and morale risk
9. Maratha Administration (Detailed)
Central Structure
- Chhatrapati (king) — ceremonial after Shahu (1749 onwards)
- Peshwa — effective executive; based at Poona's Shaniwar Wada palace
- Ashtapradhan largely maintained as advisory council; ministers' powers evolved
Revenue Administration
- Chauth and Sardeshmukhi from external territories (see Section 4)
- Direct territories: Prant (province) → Subha → Paragana → Village
- Revenue officials: Deshpande (district accountant), Kulkarni (village accountant), Patil (village headman)
- Hereditary local officials maintained — Marathas did not disrupt local revenue patterns; accommodationist approach to administration
Military Evolution
- Post-Shivaji: shift away from paid standing army toward jagir/watandar system — noble militia replaced Bargirs
- French and European mercenaries used by Mahadji Sindhia — de Boigne and Perron built modern artillery "Brigade System"
- Fort administration retained — 360 forts at peak; three separate officials per fort
Financial Sources
- Land revenue from core Maharashtra territories
- Chauth from Deccan subas (Mughal/Nizam territories)
- Plunder and tribute from North Indian campaigns
- Nazrana (tribute) from weaker chiefs
Weaknesses of Maratha Administration
- No uniform administrative system across the confederacy — each chief (Sindhia/Holkar/Bhonsle/Gaekwad) ruled independently; coordination in crisis was impossible
- Financial extortion through Chauth/Sardeshmukhi alienated populations → no popular support base outside Maharashtra
- Absence of professional civil service comparable to the Mughal bureaucracy
- Hindu-centric identity limited appeal to Muslim subjects; could not build the cross-religious coalitions that the Mughals had maintained
- Peshwa system = Brahmin dominance over Kshatriya Chhatrapati — internal tension never fully resolved
10. Post-Mughal Regional States I: Bengal, Awadh, Punjab
Bengal — Nawabs of Bengal-Bihar-Orissa
| Nawab | Period | Key Development |
|---|---|---|
| Murshid Quli Khan | 1717–1727 | Established Bengal's autonomy; moved capital to Murshidabad; excellent administration; revenue reform; Mughal tribute eventually stopped |
| Shuja-ud-Din | 1727–1739 | Continued good rule; extended to Orissa |
| Alivardi Khan | 1740–1756 | Stopped paying Mughal tribute; defeated Maratha raids (built "Maratha Ditch"); capable ruler; denied European trading privileges |
| Siraj-ud-Daulah | 1756–1757 | Last independent Nawab; captured Calcutta (Black Hole incident 1756); defeated at Battle of Plassey 1757 by Clive + treachery of Mir Jafar; British control established |
Awadh — Nawab Wazirs
| Nawab | Period | Key Development |
|---|---|---|
| Saadat Khan Burhan-ul-Mulk | 1722–1739 | Founded dynasty; Shia Muslim culture; inadvertently facilitated Nadir Shah's invasion (invited him to adjudicate internal disputes) |
| Safdar Jang | 1739–1756 | Also Mughal Wazir; complex court intrigues; Faizabad as capital |
| Shuja-ud-Daula | 1756–1775 | Allied with Mughals and Abdali; defeated at Battle of Buxar 1764; Treaty of Allahabad 1765; lost sovereignty to British |
| Asaf-ud-Daula | 1775–1797 | Moved capital to Lucknow; Lucknow culture — tehzeeb, Urdu poetry, kathak, nawabi cuisine; built Bara Imambara |
| Wajid Ali Shah | 1847–1856 | Last Nawab; culturally brilliant (thumri, Kathak); annexed by Dalhousie 1856 "on grounds of mismanagement" (Doctrine of Lapse) |
Awadh's composite culture: Shia Muslim + Hindu synthesis; Lucknow tehzeeb (refinement); Urdu/Rekhta literary tradition; Biryani; Kathak dance; chikankari embroidery. Considered the zenith of Indo-Islamic cultural synthesis — and its deliberate destruction by annexation is a recurring UPSC theme.
Punjab — Rise of Sikh Power
| Period | Development |
|---|---|
| Guru Gobind Singh (1666–1708) | Created Khalsa (1699) — 5 Ks (Kesh/Kangha/Kara/Kachha/Kirpan); Amrit ceremony; militarised Sikh community; four sahibzadas killed; Zafarnama to Aurangzeb |
| Banda Singh Bahadur (1708–1716) | First Sikh territorial control; captured Sirhind (1710); abolished zamindari in his territory; executed by Mughals 1716 |
| Sikh Misls (1716–1799) | 12 confederacies (misls); Sikh Sardars governed Punjab independently; fragmented but resilient against Afghans and Mughals |
| Ranjit Singh (1780–1839) | United all 12 misls; captured Lahore (1799) → Amritsar → entire Punjab; Treaty of Amritsar 1809 with British (Sutlej as boundary); modernised army (French officers — Allard, Ventura, Court); Kohinoor in treasury; greatest Sikh ruler; title Maharaja |
11. Post-Mughal Regional States II: Rajputana, Gujarat, Malwa, Kashmir, Assam, Orissa
Rajputana
- Rajput states became increasingly autonomous after Aurangzeb's death (1707)
- Key states: Mewar (Udaipur), Amber/Jaipur, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Jaisalmer
- Sawai Jai Singh II (1699–1743) of Jaipur — greatest post-Mughal Rajput ruler: founded Jaipur (1727, India's first planned city); built five Jantar Mantar observatories (Delhi, Jaipur, Mathura, Varanasi, Ujjain); compiled Zij-i-Muhammad Shahi (astronomical tables); patronised Sanskrit scholarship; served Mughals nominally while acting independently
- Durga Das Rathor — led Marwar resistance against Aurangzeb; protected young Ajit Singh from Mughal seizure
- Rajput states later came under British Subsidiary Alliance; survived as Princely States until 1947
Gujarat
- Mughal control weakened post-1707; multiple claimants to governorship
- Marathas collected Chauth; Gaekwad family (Maratha) effectively controlled much of Gujarat from Baroda by 1720s
- Nawab of Surat (Mughal governor) lost real power; British EIC controlled Surat trade
- Gujarat integrated into Bombay Presidency by 1817 after Third Anglo-Maratha War
Malwa
- Contested between Mughals, Marathas, and Nizam through 1720s–30s
- Holkar family (Maratha) dominant by 1730s; Indore as capital
- Ahilyabai Holkar (1765–1795): Administered Malwa; excellent governance; promoted trade, built temples and pilgrimage routes; still celebrated as "Punyashloki" (holy sovereign); her 300th Birth Anniversary celebrated nationally in 2025
Kashmir
- Post-Aurangzeb: Mughal governor became autonomous; weak administration
- Invaded by Nadir Shah (1739) — formally included in Durrani (Afghan) Empire after Ahmad Shah Abdali's campaigns
- Afghan control: 1752–1819 — a period of misrule; heavy taxation; depopulation
- Ranjit Singh's general Hari Singh Nalwa conquered Kashmir (1819) — integrated into Sikh Empire; relatively better administration
Assam — Ahom Kingdom
- Ahom Kingdom maintained independence throughout the entire Mughal period (17 Mughal invasions — all failed)
- Lachit Borphukan — Ahom general; defeated Aurangzeb's massive force at Battle of Saraighat (1671) on the Brahmaputra near Guwahati — greatest Assamese military victory; Mughal commander Ram Singh I defeated; Lachit used river current and knowledge of terrain brilliantly
- Famous quote: During battle, Lachit reportedly dismissed soldiers who had paused construction of defences saying: "My uncle is not greater than my country" (executed an uncle who delayed work) — symbol of duty over kinship
- Ahom state weakened in 18th century by internal succession disputes; Burmese invasions (1817–22); British annexed through Treaty of Yandabo (1826)
- Current affairs: Lachit Borphukan 400th Birth Anniversary (2022) — GoI celebrated nationally; bust unveiled at NDA; Assam's demand for Bharat Ratna for Lachit
Orissa
- Controlled by Mughals (as part of Bengal subah) until 1751
- Marathas under Raghuji Bhonsle (Nagpur) conquered Orissa (1751); collected Chauth; Orissa became a Bhonsle jagir territory
- British took Orissa in 1803 during the Second Anglo-Maratha War
12. Post-Mughal Regional States III: Southern India — Mysore & Travancore
Mysore
Background: Mysore ruled by Hindu Wadiyar dynasty since 1399; nominal vassals of Vijayanagara, then under Mughal suzerainty.
Hyder Ali (1721–1782)
- Rose from ordinary soldier to de facto ruler of Mysore by 1761 (effectively sidelined Wodeyar king)
- Military genius: created first Indian army with European-style infantry, artillery, and Mysorean rockets — iron-cased, first such metal-cylinder rockets in history; predecessor to modern rocketry
- Expanded Mysore: conquered Malabar (Kerala coast), Bednur/Ikkeri, parts of Maratha territory
- First Anglo-Mysore War (1767–69): Defeated the British; forced Treaty of Madras — British returned all conquests; one of the few times British were humiliated in India
- Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780–84): Died mid-war (December 1782) of cancer; succeeded by son Tipu Sultan
Tipu Sultan (1782–1799)
- "Tiger of Mysore"; most formidable opponent of the British in 18th century India
- Modernisation: New calendar (mauludi calendar), new coinage, new weights/measures, sericulture (silk industry introduced to Karnataka), encouraged trade with Afghanistan/Persia/France
- Mysorean rockets: Used against British in multiple battles; iron-cased rockets with bamboo guide poles; impressed European observers; William Congreve used them as basis for Congreve Rockets (used in Napoleonic Wars)
- Revolutionary sympathiser: Jacobin Club (Mysore) member; planted "Tree of Liberty"; called himself "Citizen Tipu"; corresponded with Napoleon Bonaparte and sought French alliance against British
- Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–92): Defeated by Cornwallis coalition (British + Marathas + Nizam); Treaty of Seringapatam 1792 — ceded half his territory; gave two sons as hostages to British
- Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799): Arthur Wellesley (future Duke of Wellington) led British; fall of Seringapatam (4 May 1799); Tipu Sultan died defending his capital — last major ruler to die fighting the British; Wadiyar dynasty restored after his death
- Legacy: Nationalist icon in India; Kerala/Karnataka name streets and institutions after him; his rocketry inspired modern missile technology; remains politically contested in contemporary India
Travancore
Martanda Varma (1729–1758)
- United fragmented Kerala principalities into the kingdom of Travancore
- Battle of Colachel (1741): Defeated Dutch East India Company (VOC) — the only time a European colonial power was defeated by an Indian state in the 18th century; Dutch commander Eustachius De Lannoy captured
- De Lannoy taken into Travancore service as naval commander; trained Travancore army in European methods for 37 years — the irony of the defeated enemy modernising the victor
- Built Nedumkotta (Travancore lines) — defensive wall across Kerala protecting against Mysore and other threats
- "Servant of Padmanabha" — dedicated kingdom to Lord Vishnu (Padmanabhaswamy); Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Thiruvananthapuram (treasury valued at Rs 1+ lakh crore discovered 2011)
- Travancore = "model state" — later praised by the British for administration, literacy levels, and potential for social reform
Dharma Raja Karthika Thirunal (1758–1798)
- Tipu Sultan invaded Travancore (1789) — claimed Travancore violated a boundary (Cochin wall)
- British-Travancore alliance against Tipu — triggered British intervention; a proximate cause of Third Anglo-Mysore War
13. Significance & Legacy of 18th Century India
Historical Debate — Was 18th Century India a "Dark Age"?
- Traditional view (British historiography): 18th century = chaos, anarchy, decline after Aurangzeb — used to justify British rule as "restoration of order"
- Revisionist view (Sanjay Subrahmanyam, C.A. Bayly, Stewart Gordon): "Successor states" were NOT mere chaos — Bengal, Awadh, Hyderabad, and Mysore had sophisticated administration, revenue systems, and cultural flourishing; regional cultures prospered; trade and commerce continued; the "dark age" narrative was a British colonial construct
- Balanced view: Both continuity (institutional) and disruption (warfare, extortion) were present; outcomes differed sharply by region
Key Legacy Points
- Maratha Confederacy = last major pan-Indian political force before British; understanding their failure explains why no Indian power could resist the EIC
- Shivaji's admin innovations (Chauth/Sardeshmukhi, paid army, naval force, spy network, vernacular administration) directly influenced later nationalist imagination — he became the archetypal Hindu king-hero for the independence movement
- Ahilyabai Holkar = pre-modern model of women's governance; welfare state before the concept existed
- Tipu Sultan = earliest experiment with administrative modernisation AND explicit anti-colonial resistance ideology
- Ranjit Singh's Sikh Empire = only Indian state to adopt European military technology successfully without losing sovereignty (until 1849 — Anglo-Sikh Wars)
- Battle of Colachel (1741) = only European defeat by an Indian state in the 18th century — Travancore
- Battle of Plassey (1757) and Buxar (1764) = the transition from Mughal successor state politics to British colonial dominance
UPSC Mains Key Themes
- Was Maratha failure structural (administration/ideology: no national appeal, Brahmin-Maratha dominance, Chauth as extortion) or contingent (Panipat III, British technological superiority)?
- Role of 18th century regional cultures (Awadh, Bengal, Mysore) in India's composite heritage
- Compare Shivaji's administration with Akbar's — different models of medieval Indian statecraft (vernacular vs cosmopolitan; military tribute vs direct territorial revenue; Maratha-centric vs pan-Indian)
Current Affairs Link
- Shivaji Maharaj Memorial (Mumbai): Proposed Shivaji Maharaj statue in the Arabian Sea off Mumbai coast — ongoing construction and controversy over cost, scale, and design. UPSC link: heritage, national symbolism, and use of historical figures in contemporary politics.
- Panipat Battlefield Heritage: ASI efforts at the Third Battle of Panipat (1761) battlefield site in Haryana; UNESCO World Heritage consideration for Panipat battlefields. Haryana government heritage corridor proposals.
- Lachit Borphukan 400th Birth Anniversary (2022): Government of India celebrated nationally; bust unveiled at National Defence Academy (NDA), Pune; Assam's demand for Bharat Ratna for Lachit; UPSC connection — Ahom Kingdom, Battle of Saraighat, northeastern history.
- Padmanabhaswamy Temple (Travancore connection): Supreme Court 2020 ruling — temple administration returned to Travancore royal family (Thiruvananthapuram); the temple's six vaults, with discovered wealth valued at Rs 1+ lakh crore (one vault still sealed by court order), make it the richest temple in the world. UPSC link: Martanda Varma, Travancore, religious endowments.
- Tipu Sultan Controversy: Karnataka — debate over schools dropping Tipu Jayanti state holiday; Mysore city name vs "Mysuru" branding; Tipu's image in textbooks. UPSC link: colonial-era heritage disputes, evaluation of historical figures, presentism vs historical context.
- Ahilyabai Holkar 300th Birth Anniversary (2025): GoI and state government programmes in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh; commemorative coins; Indore's model urban development cited in her honour. UPSC link: women rulers, Maratha administration, governance traditions.
Previous Year Questions (UPSC)
Q. The Maratha political system that was known as the Ashtapradhan was a council of: (a) Eight Brahmins (b) Eight commanders (c) Eight ministers (d) Eight provinces
Hint: (c) Eight ministers — not all Brahmins; the council included Senapati (military commander), Nyayadhish (chief justice), Panditrao (ecclesiastical), Peshwa (prime minister), etc. Only Panditrao was purely religious. Classic option (a) trap.
Q. Consider the following statements: (1) Tipu Sultan was contemporary of both Hyder Ali and Marathas. (2) Tipu Sultan was killed at the Third Battle of Panipat. Which statements are correct?
Hint: Statement 1 correct — Tipu was Hyder Ali's son (1782–1799); he fought Marathas in multiple wars. Statement 2 incorrect — Tipu died at Battle of Seringapatam (4 May 1799), not at Panipat. Panipat III (1761) was Afghans vs Marathas — 22 years before Tipu became ruler. A classic anachronism trap.
Q. With reference to 18th century India, consider the following statements about Chauth: (1) It was 1/4th of land revenue. (2) It was collected from non-Maratha territories. (3) It was paid to the Mughal emperor. Select the correct statements.
Hint: Statements 1 and 2 correct. Statement 3 incorrect — Chauth was collected BY the Marathas FROM territories they did NOT rule (Mughal, Nizam, Bijapur territories) as military protection money; it was NOT paid to the Mughal emperor. The direction of payment is the trap.
Q. Who among the following were associated with the Maratha confederacy? (1) Holkar of Indore (2) Gaekwad of Baroda (3) Bhonsle of Nagpur (4) Sindhia of Gwalior
Hint: All four correct — these were four of the five major Maratha houses (fifth: Peshwa of Poona). UPSC uses the "how many statements are correct" format to test whether candidates know the complete list. Always remember: Peshwa (Poona), Sindhia (Gwalior), Holkar (Indore), Bhonsle (Nagpur), Gaekwad (Baroda).
Q. With reference to Lachit Borphukan, which of the following is/are correct? (1) He was a military general of the Ahom kingdom. (2) He defeated the Mughal forces at the Battle of Saraighat. (3) He belonged to the 17th century. Select the correct option.
Hint: All three correct. Lachit Borphukan (1622–1672); Battle of Saraighat (1671) on the Brahmaputra near Guwahati; defeated Ram Singh I (Mughal commander sent by Aurangzeb); his fleet used the Brahmaputra's current brilliantly against Mughal naval forces. 17th century = 1601–1700 CE — so 1622 and 1671 both fall within it.
Q. Consider the following statements about Maratha Peshwas: (1) Balaji Vishwanath was the first Peshwa to make the office hereditary. (2) Baji Rao I was defeated at the Battle of Bhopal. (3) Madhav Rao I was known as the saviour of the Maratha Empire. How many statements are correct?
Hint: Statements 1 and 3 correct. Statement 2 incorrect — Baji Rao I WON at Battle of Bhopal (1737) against the Mughal forces under Nizam-ul-Mulk. It was the Nizam who was defeated. This question tests precise factual recall — the most common error is confusing victory and defeat at Bhopal.
Q. With reference to the Battle of Colachel (1741), which of the following statements is/are correct? (1) It was fought between Travancore and the Dutch East India Company. (2) It was the first military defeat of a European power by an Indian ruler in the 18th century. (3) The defeated commander Eustachius De Lannoy was later employed by Travancore.
Hint: All three correct. Martanda Varma of Travancore defeated Dutch VOC; De Lannoy (Dutch commander) captured and taken prisoner; served as naval/military commander for Travancore for 37 years, training the army in European methods — the irony of a defeated enemy modernising the victor's military.
Q. Examine the factors that led to the defeat of the Marathas at the Third Battle of Panipat.
Hint: Supply crisis (6-month standoff depleted food for 150,000 people); alienated allies (Jat/Rajput/Awadh refused to help — Maratha arrogance during expansion); strategic overextension (Bengal to Attock); inexperienced commanders (Vishwas Rao/Bhau Sahib) vs Abdali's veteran Durrani cavalry; Afghan camel-mounted swivel guns vs Maratha artillery; loss of commanders mid-battle broke morale; no unified command across confederacy; bringing camp followers created logistical nightmare.
Q. The Maratha power emerged not merely as a military force but as an alternative state system. Critically evaluate the administrative innovations of Shivaji.
Hint: Ashtapradhan (compare with Akbar's administration); Chauth/Sardeshmukhi as tribute system (innovative but exploitative from taxed populations' perspective); paid standing army (broke jagir dependence); triple commandant fort system; Marathi in administration (vernacularisation — democratisation of state language); navy; intelligence network. Limitation: did not create unified territory-based taxation; Chauth = exploitative; Hindu-centric identity. Balanced critical answer needed.
Q. Highlight the importance of the regional states emerging out of the disintegration of the Mughal Empire. Were these states responsible for promoting cultural synthesis and economic growth in their regions?
Hint: Awadh — Urdu, kathak, tehzeeb, composite culture; Bengal — trade/revenue sophistication (precondition for British colonial economy); Mysore — rockets, sericulture, modernisation; Hyderabad — Dakhni synthesis; Travancore — administrative model; BUT: regional wars, extortion (Chauth), repeated succession crises also caused instability. Revisionist historians (Bayly, Subrahmanyam) vs traditional "dark age" view. Balanced answer needed.
Q. The Third Battle of Panipat was the climax of Anglo-French rivalry in India. Comment.
Hint: Incorrect premise in the question — Third Battle of Panipat (1761) involved Abdali (Afghans) vs Marathas, NOT British/French. Anglo-French rivalry in India = Carnatic Wars (1744–1763). Good UPSC answer corrects the premise while explaining: Panipat III was entirely an Afghan-Maratha conflict; British were observers; long-term beneficiary (power vacuum allowed EIC expansion). The question tests whether students confuse Panipat III with the Carnatic context.
Q. Critically assess the role of Tipu Sultan in the history of 18th century India. How should we evaluate leaders like Tipu who resisted colonial powers but also had religious and political controversies?
Hint: Tipu as moderniser (rockets, sericulture, calendar, coinage, trade); anti-colonial resistance (four Anglo-Mysore wars); symbolic significance (Tree of Liberty, Jacobin Club); BUT: forced conversions (disputed — some evidence exists, scale contested); temple destructions (some temples simultaneously protected — contradictions); treatment of Nairs and Christians in Malabar. UPSC answer: contextualise in 18th century norms; use historical evidence, avoid presentism; acknowledge both achievements and controversies proportionately.
Q. Analyse the factors responsible for the decline of the Maratha Empire. To what extent was the Third Battle of Panipat a turning point?
Hint: Factors beyond Panipat: no national ideology (Brahmin-Maratha dominance, not pan-Indian appeal); Chauth as extortion alienated populations; confederacy structure prevented unified command; no sea power after Kanhoji Angre's era; British technological/strategic superiority. Panipat = turning point for North India ambitions but NOT terminal — Madhav Rao I rebuilt by 1770s. Anglo-Maratha Wars (especially Treaty of Bassein 1802) = actual death blow. Use Panipat as one turning point among several.
Q. Compare and contrast Shivaji's administrative system with that of the Mughal Empire under Akbar. What does this comparison reveal about the different models of medieval Indian statecraft?
Hint: Akbar — centralised, cosmopolitan (mansabdars from all communities), Persian + Indian hybrid, direct territorial revenue (Ain-i-Dahsala), paid bureaucracy; Shivaji — decentralised, Maratha-centric, Marathi language (vernacularisation), revenue from both direct territory AND external tribute (Chauth), military-focused, fort-centred. Both: non-hereditary military command (Akbar: mansabs; Shivaji: Bargirs). Key difference: Akbar integrated Rajputs/Persians/Afghans into a unified system; Shivaji created a distinct Maratha identity as resistance against Mughal-Bijapur overlordship. Akbar's system more durable as civil administration; Shivaji's as military resistance model.
Quick Revision — 20 Must-Know Facts
- Shivaji's father: Shahji Bhonsle (jagirdar under Bijapur); mother: Jijabai; guardian: Dadaji Kondadev
- Shivaji's first fort: Torna 1646 (age ~16)
- Afzal Khan killed 1659 at Pratapgad — wagh nakh (tiger claws)
- Treaty of Purandar 1665: 23 forts surrendered to Jai Singh; retained 12; Sambhaji given 5,000 mansab
- Agra escape 1666: from Mirza Raja's mansion; sweet-basket legend; disguised as saints/traders
- Coronation: 1674 at Raigad; Gaga Bhatt certified Kshatriya; titles = Chhatrapati, Shakakarta
- Ashtapradhan: 8 ministers; Peshwa = head; NOT a cabinet — each reported directly to Shivaji
- Chauth = 1/4th (25%) revenue from external territories; Sardeshmukhi = 10% additional = total 35%
- Sambhaji executed 1689 by Aurangzeb — Maratha martyr; Tarabai fought 17 more years until Aurangzeb's death 1707
- Balaji Vishwanath: first powerful Peshwa (1713); negotiated Chauth/Sardeshmukhi rights from Sayyid Brothers 1719; made Peshwaship hereditary
- Baji Rao I: "never lost a battle"; Battle of Bhopal 1737 (WON vs Mughals); reached gates of Delhi; died 1740 age 39
- Ahilyabai Holkar 1765–95: model Malwa administrator; restored temples (Kashi Vishwanath, Somnath); Indore; 300th birth anniversary 2025
- Third Battle of Panipat: 14 January 1761; Vishwas Rao + Bhau Sahib vs Abdali; 28,000 Marathas killed; Peshwa Nana Sahib died of grief
- Maratha Confederacy five houses: Peshwa (Poona), Sindhia (Gwalior), Holkar (Indore), Bhonsle (Nagpur), Gaekwad (Baroda)
- Treaty of Bassein 1802: Baji Rao II accepted British subsidiary alliance — beginning of the end; Peshwaship abolished 1818
- Battle of Plassey 1757: Siraj-ud-Daulah vs Clive; Mir Jafar treachery; beginning of British rule in India
- Ranjit Singh: unified 12 Sikh misls (1799); Treaty of Amritsar 1809 (Sutlej as boundary with British); French officers; Kohinoor; Maharaja
- Battle of Colachel 1741: Martanda Varma (Travancore) defeated Dutch VOC; only European defeat by Indian state in 18th century; De Lannoy served Travancore 37 years
- Lachit Borphukan: Ahom general; Battle of Saraighat 1671 on Brahmaputra; defeated Ram Singh I (Mughal); 400th anniversary 2022; bust at NDA
- Tipu Sultan: 4th Anglo-Mysore War 1799; Mysorean rockets; Tree of Liberty; Jacobin Club; died defending Seringapatam (4 May 1799); Wadiyar dynasty restored after his death
