State Legislature & Special Provisions for Some States
The State Legislature — comprising the Governor, Vidhan Sabha, and in six states the Vidhan Parishad — is the legislative arm of each state. Understanding the composition, powers, and procedure of state legislatures, along with the special constitutional protections for certain states (Arts 370–371J), is critical for GS-II and Polity questions.
On this page
- Conceptual Clarity
- Composition — Art. 168
- Vidhan Sabha (Legislative Assembly)
- Vidhan Parishad (Legislative Council)
- Creation/Abolition — Art. 169
- VS vs VP — Comparison
- Speaker of Vidhan Sabha
- Legislative Procedure in States
- Governor's Ordinance — Art. 213
- Reserved Bills — Art. 200
- Art. 370 — J&K Special Status (Abrogated)
- Art. 371 to 371J — Special Provisions
- Prelims PYQs
- Mains PYQs
- 15-Minute Revision Box
Conceptual Clarity — State Legislature in India's Federal Structure
India has a quasi-federal structure with a strong Centre. Each state has its own legislature to enact laws on State List and Concurrent List subjects. Unlike Parliament which is always bicameral, most state legislatures are unicameral (only Vidhan Sabha). Only 6 states maintain a Vidhan Parishad, making them bicameral. The Governor acts as the nominal executive head for the state, playing the same role the President plays at the Centre.
- Unicameral: All states except 6 — only Vidhan Sabha exists.
- Bicameral: 6 states have both Vidhan Sabha + Vidhan Parishad.
- Key difference from Parliament: In Parliament, both Houses are co-equal on most legislation. In states, Vidhan Sabha dominates — VP can only delay, not reject.
Part A — State Legislature (Arts 168–212)
1. Composition of State Legislature (Art. 168)
Article 168 provides that for every state there shall be a Legislature consisting of:
- Governor (in all states)
- Vidhan Sabha (Legislative Assembly) — in all states
- Vidhan Parishad (Legislative Council) — only in 6 states
1.1 Bicameral States (6)
The following 6 states have both Vidhan Sabha and Vidhan Parishad:
Bicameral States
- Andhra Pradesh
- Telangana
- Uttar Pradesh
- Bihar
- Maharashtra
- Karnataka
Unicameral States
All other states — including large states like Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Gujarat, Punjab — have only Vidhan Sabha.
Note: All Union Territories have Legislatures created by Parliament (not under Art. 168), except Delhi (GNCTD) and Puducherry.
2. Vidhan Sabha — Legislative Assembly (Art. 170)
2.1 Strength
- Not more than 500 members and not less than 60 members (Art. 170)
- Exception: Goa, Sikkim, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh have fewer than 60 members (special constitutional provisions under Art. 371I for Goa — minimum 30 seats).
- Members are elected by direct election on the basis of adult suffrage.
2.2 Term
- Normal term: 5 years from the date of its first sitting after each general election.
- Can be dissolved earlier by the Governor (on advice of Chief Minister, or in case of breakdown of constitutional machinery).
- During a Proclamation of Emergency (Art. 352), term can be extended by Parliament one year at a time.
2.3 Qualifications (Art. 173)
- Must be a citizen of India
- Must be not less than 25 years of age
- Name must be in the electoral roll of any constituency of that state
- Must not hold any office of profit under GoI or state government
- Must not be of unsound mind or insolvent
2.4 Special Powers of Vidhan Sabha
- Money Bills can only be introduced in Vidhan Sabha — not in VP (Art. 198)
- Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to Vidhan Sabha (Art. 164(2)) — not to VP
- In case of disagreement between VS and VP on a bill — VS always prevails
- Speaker and Deputy Speaker are elected by VS members from among themselves
- Resolutions on creation/abolition of VP are passed by VS (Art. 169)
2.5 Speaker of Vidhan Sabha
- Elected by members of VS from among themselves
- Presides over sittings; guardian of rights, privileges, and dignity of the House
- Has a casting vote in case of a tie
- Can be removed by an effective majority (more than 50% of total membership of VS) — Art. 179
- While a resolution for removal is pending, Speaker cannot preside (Deputy Speaker presides)
- Certifies whether a bill is a Money Bill or not — decision is final
3. Vidhan Parishad — Legislative Council (Art. 171)
3.1 Strength
- Not more than 1/3 of the total membership of the Vidhan Sabha
- Not less than 40 members (in no case)
- Exception: Jammu & Kashmir — its VP had only 36 members (special law)
3.2 Composition — How Members are Elected/Nominated
The 5 categories of Vidhan Parishad members (Art. 171(3)):
| Category | Fraction | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Local Bodies (municipalities, district boards, etc.) | 1/3 | Elected by members of local bodies |
| Graduates (at least 3 years standing) | 1/12 | Elected by graduates of the state |
| Teachers (secondary schools and above) | 1/12 | Elected by teachers of the state |
| Members of Vidhan Sabha | 1/3 | Elected by VS members from among persons who are not VS members |
| Governor's Nominees | 1/6 | Nominated by Governor (persons of distinction in literature, science, art, cooperative movement, social service) |
3.3 Term and Nature
- Permanent body — cannot be dissolved (like Rajya Sabha)
- Term of each member: 6 years
- 1/3 members retire every 2 years
- Qualification: must be not less than 30 years of age (vs. 25 for VS)
- Presided over by Chairman and Deputy Chairman (elected by VP members)
3.4 Powers of Vidhan Parishad — Limitations
- VP is a weak second chamber — unlike Rajya Sabha at Centre, VP has very limited powers
- Cannot reject Money Bills — can only make recommendations within 14 days
- For ordinary bills — VP can delay by maximum 4 months (3 months first time + 1 month second time); if VS repasses, VP cannot block
- Council of Ministers is NOT responsible to VP — only to VS
- No joint sitting provision for states (unlike Parliament's Art. 108) — VS automatically prevails
4. Creation and Abolition of Vidhan Parishad (Art. 169)
4.1 Procedure
Parliament can create or abolish a Vidhan Parishad by ordinary legislation, but only after:
- The Vidhan Sabha of that state passes a resolution by special majority:
- Not less than 2/3 of members present and voting, AND
- A majority of total membership of the VS
- After that resolution, Parliament passes a simple majority Act to create or abolish the VP.
4.2 Recent Developments
| State | Development | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Andhra Pradesh | VP abolished | 1985 |
| Andhra Pradesh | VP recreated | 2007 |
| Jammu & Kashmir | VP abolished (J&K Reorganization Act — state bifurcated into 2 UTs) | 2019 |
| Odisha | Passed resolution to create VP; pending Parliament approval | 2018 |
5. Vidhan Sabha vs Vidhan Parishad — Comparison
5.1 Detailed Comparison Table
| Feature | Vidhan Sabha | Vidhan Parishad |
|---|---|---|
| Constitutional basis | Art. 170 | Art. 171 |
| Strength | 60–500 members | Max 1/3 of VS; Min 40 |
| Election | Direct election | Indirect (5 categories) + nominated |
| Term | 5 years (dissoluble) | 6 years (permanent) |
| Age qualification | 25 years | 30 years |
| Money Bills | Only here; VP cannot reject | Only recommendations (14 days) |
| Ordinary bills — delay power | Can override VP | Maximum 4 months delay |
| CoM responsible to | YES (Art. 164(2)) | NO |
| Dissolution | YES — Governor can dissolve | NO — permanent body |
| Presiding officer | Speaker | Chairman |
| Special resolutions | Passes resolution for VP creation/abolition | No such power |
| Present in | All states | 6 states only |
6. Speaker of Vidhan Sabha
6.1 Election and Removal
- Speaker is elected by VS members from among themselves after each general election
- Deputy Speaker is similarly elected by VS members
- Speaker can be removed by a resolution passed by effective majority of VS (more than 50% of total membership — Art. 179)
- Before a resolution for removal is moved, 14 days' notice must be given
- While such a resolution is pending, Speaker cannot preside — Deputy Speaker takes over
6.2 Powers and Functions
- Presides over sittings of VS and maintains order
- Certifies whether a bill is a Money Bill — decision is final and cannot be challenged in courts
- Casting vote in case of tie (does not vote in first instance)
- Decides questions of disqualification on grounds of defection (10th Schedule)
- Adjourns the House or suspends sitting in absence of quorum
- Does not vacate office on dissolution of VS — continues until first sitting of new VS
7. Legislative Procedure in States
7.1 Ordinary Bills — Unicameral States
- Bill introduced in VS → passed by simple majority → sent to Governor
- Governor may: give assent, withhold assent, return for reconsideration, or reserve for President
7.2 Ordinary Bills — Bicameral States
- Bill introduced in either VS or VP (except Money Bills)
- Must be passed by both Houses in same form — or
- If VP rejects or amends unacceptably: VS can repasses the bill → sent to VP again
- If VP does not pass within 1 month → bill deemed passed by both Houses
- Total maximum delay by VP on ordinary bills: 4 months (3 months first time + 1 month second time)
- No joint sitting provision — VS always prevails automatically
7.3 Money Bills (Art. 198–199)
- Can only be introduced in Vidhan Sabha
- After passage in VS, sent to VP
- VP can make recommendations — within 14 days
- VS may accept or reject VP's recommendations — VS's decision is final
- If VP does not return within 14 days, bill deemed passed by both Houses
- Speaker certifies a Money Bill — certification is final
7.4 Constitutional Amendments
State legislatures cannot amend the Constitution on their own. Only Parliament can amend the Constitution (Art. 368). However, certain amendments require ratification by at least half of the state legislatures (e.g., those affecting federal provisions — Arts 54, 55, 73, 162, etc.).
| Type of Bill | Introduced in | VP's Power | Delay Possible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Bill | Either House (VS or VP) | Can delay max 4 months | Yes — max 4 months |
| Money Bill | Only VS | Only recommendations in 14 days | Max 14 days |
| Constitutional Amendment | Only Parliament | N/A | N/A |
8. Governor's Ordinance Making Power (Art. 213)
8.1 When Can Governor Issue an Ordinance?
- When the Vidhan Sabha is not in session (or both Houses if bicameral)
- Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist requiring immediate action
- Scope: only on subjects in the State List and Concurrent List (not Union List)
- On Concurrent List subjects, Governor needs President's instructions in certain cases
8.2 Conditions and Limitations
- An Ordinance has the same force as an Act of Legislature
- It must be laid before the Legislature on reassembly
- Lapses at the expiry of 6 weeks from reassembly of VS (or earlier House, if bicameral)
- Can be withdrawn by Governor at any time
- Cannot be issued to amend the Constitution
- Cannot be issued if the bill containing same provisions would require President's assent
- Subject to judicial review — cannot be issued for mala fide purposes (D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar, 1987)
8.3 D.C. Wadhwa Case (1987) — Landmark
The Supreme Court held that the Governor cannot re-promulgate ordinances repeatedly to bypass the legislature. Doing so would be fraud on the Constitution. The legislative power of the state must be exercised by the elected legislature — not by the executive through continuous ordinances. This principle applies equally to the President under Art. 123.
9. Reserved Bills — Art. 200 and Art. 201
9.1 Art. 200 — Governor's Options on a Bill
When a bill is presented to the Governor after passage by the state legislature:
- Give assent — bill becomes law
- Withhold assent — bill lapses
- Return for reconsideration (except Money Bills) — if VS repasses it (with or without amendment), Governor must give assent
- Reserve for President's consideration — Governor sends to President
9.2 Art. 201 — President's Options on a Reserved Bill
When a bill is reserved for President:
- Give assent
- Withhold assent — bill lapses permanently
- Direct Governor to return for state legislature's reconsideration (except Money Bills)
- If state legislature repasses — it is again presented to President who is not obliged to give assent (unlike the Governor who must assent after re-passage)
9.3 When Must Governor Reserve for President?
- When the bill would derogate from powers of the High Court (Art. 200 proviso)
- When bill relates to compulsory acquisition of property under Art. 31A
- When directed by President to do so
- When bill otherwise endangers the position of the High Court
Part B — Special Provisions for Some States (Arts 370–371J)
10. Art. 370 — Special Status of J&K (Abrogated)
10.1 What Art. 370 Provided
- Conferred special autonomous status on Jammu & Kashmir
- Parliament could legislate for J&K only on Defence, External Affairs, Finance, and Communications
- Other central laws could be extended only with J&K government's concurrence
- J&K had its own Constitution (1956), its own flag, and Sadr-e-Riyasat (Governor equivalent)
- Art. 35A (inserted in 1954 by Presidential Order) gave J&K legislature exclusive power to define "permanent residents" and their special privileges
10.2 Abrogation in 2019
- On 5 August 2019, Presidential Order (C.O. 272) declared Art. 370 inoperative (applying all provisions of Constitution to J&K)
- Simultaneously, J&K Reorganization Act 2019 bifurcated the state into two Union Territories: (a) J&K (with Legislature) and (b) Ladakh (without Legislature)
- Art. 35A was simultaneously abrogated
- All central laws now apply to J&K directly
10.3 Supreme Court Verdict — December 2023
- Constitution Bench (5 judges) led by CJI DY Chandrachud
- Upheld the abrogation of Art. 370 as constitutionally valid
- Held that J&K had no sovereignty — President acting under Art. 356 had full powers
- Directed restoration of statehood to J&K (Ladakh to remain UT)
- Directed elections to J&K Legislative Assembly by September 2024 (held in October 2024)
11. Arts 371 to 371J — Special Provisions for States
11.1 Overview
Articles 371 to 371J provide special provisions for certain states — mostly northeastern states and some others — recognising their unique cultural, historical, demographic, or geographic characteristics. These provisions protect customary laws, ensure regional equity, and give special responsibilities to Governors in some states.
| Article | State | Key Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 371 | Maharashtra & Gujarat | President may ensure equitable arrangements for development of Vidarbha, Marathwada, Saurashtra, Kutch; separate development boards |
| Art. 371A | Nagaland | Parliament cannot make laws on Naga customary law and procedure, administration of civil and criminal justice involving Naga customary law, ownership of land, without NLA's resolution |
| Art. 371B | Assam | President may provide for committee of tribal area MLAs |
| Art. 371C | Manipur | Committee of Hill Area MLAs; Governor has special responsibility re: report to President on Hill Areas |
| Art. 371D | Andhra Pradesh / Telangana | Equitable treatment of different regions in public employment and education; Administrative Tribunal for services |
| Art. 371E | Andhra Pradesh | Parliament may establish a Central University in Andhra Pradesh |
| Art. 371F | Sikkim | Sikkim's merger protection; existing laws to continue; unique electoral system; Sikkim Subjects protection; 1 seat in LS for Sikkim |
| Art. 371G | Mizoram | Parliament cannot make laws on Mizo customary practice, religious and social practices, land ownership without Mizoram Legislative Assembly's resolution |
| Art. 371H | Arunachal Pradesh | Governor has special responsibility for law and order; may act in own discretion on law and order after consulting CoM |
| Art. 371I | Goa | Minimum of 30 members in the Vidhan Sabha of Goa |
| Art. 371J | Karnataka | Special provisions for Hyderabad-Karnataka region; reservation in education and employment; separate development board |
11.2 Detailed Notes on Key Articles
Art. 371A — Nagaland (Most Important for UPSC)
- Most powerful protection — Parliament's power to legislate is completely barred on:
- Religious and social practices of the Nagas
- Naga customary law and procedure
- Administration of civil and criminal justice involving Naga customary law
- Ownership and transfer of land and its resources
- Unless the Nagaland Legislative Assembly resolves that such law shall apply
- Governor of Nagaland has special responsibility re: maintenance of internal security
Art. 371F — Sikkim (Unique)
- Inserted when Sikkim became India's 22nd state in 1975
- All existing laws of Sikkim shall continue in force
- Citizens of Sikkim (Sikkim Subjects) have all rights of Indian citizens
- Unique electoral provisions — different seats reserved for different communities (Bhutia-Lepcha, Sangha, general)
- One seat reserved in Lok Sabha for Sikkim
Art. 371H — Arunachal Pradesh
- Governor has special responsibility for law and order
- May act in his own discretion on law and order matters (after consulting Council of Ministers)
- One of very few provisions where the Governor has genuine discretion — not a nominal role
Art. 371J — Karnataka (Added by 98th Amendment, 2012)
- Applies to Hyderabad-Karnataka region (districts: Gulbarga, Bidar, Raichur, Koppal, Yadgiri, Bellary — now Ballari)
- Governor has special responsibility for equitable allocation of funds
- Reservation in educational institutions and state government employment for local persons
- Separate development board
- Most recently added of all special provisions
11.3 Comparison: Art. 371A (Nagaland) vs Art. 371G (Mizoram)
| Feature | Art. 371A — Nagaland | Art. 371G — Mizoram |
|---|---|---|
| Consent required from | Nagaland Legislative Assembly | Mizoram Legislative Assembly |
| Protected subjects | Customary law, land, civil/criminal justice involving Naga customs | Mizo customary practices, religious/social practices, land ownership |
| Governor's special responsibility | Internal security (not law and order per se) | No specific Governor discretion |
| Constitutional basis | Art. 371A (inserted 1963) | Art. 371G (inserted 1986 — at statehood) |
12. Prelims PYQs
Which of the following states currently has a bicameral legislature?
Answer: All of the 6 — Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, UP, Bihar, Maharashtra, Karnataka have Vidhan Parishad. J&K no longer has VP after 2019 reorganization.
With reference to the Vidhan Parishad, consider the following statements: (1) VP can be created by Parliament on its own without any resolution by VS. (2) VP has the power to reject a Money Bill. (3) The term of a VP member is 6 years.
Answer: (3) only is correct. Creation requires VS resolution (special majority) first — Art. 169. VP cannot reject Money Bill — only recommendations. Term is 6 years.
Under Article 169 of the Constitution, Parliament can abolish a Vidhan Parishad after the Vidhan Sabha passes a resolution by:
Answer: Not less than 2/3 of members present and voting AND a majority of total membership (special majority). Parliament then passes a simple majority Act.
In respect of a Money Bill, what happens if the Vidhan Parishad does not return it within 14 days?
Answer: The Money Bill is deemed to have been passed by both Houses. VP cannot reject — only make recommendations within 14 days.
Which of the following statements about the Governor's Ordinance making power under Art. 213 is correct?
Answer: Governor can promulgate ordinances when Vidhan Sabha is not in session; it lapses in 6 weeks from reassembly; it cannot be issued against provisions requiring President's assent; subject to judicial review (D.C. Wadhwa principle).
Art. 371A of the Constitution provides special protection to which state?
Answer: Nagaland — Parliament cannot extend laws affecting Naga customary practices, land, and customary justice without NLA's consent.
With reference to the abrogation of Art. 370, consider: (1) Presidential Order of Aug 5, 2019 declared Art. 370 inoperative. (2) The Supreme Court upheld the abrogation in December 2023. (3) Ladakh has been given statehood after the reorganization.
Answer: (1) and (2) are correct. (3) is incorrect — Ladakh became a Union Territory WITHOUT legislature. Only J&K UT has a legislature.
13. Mains PYQs
Examine the role of the Vidhan Parishad in state legislative process. Is bicameralism at the state level necessary? (250 words)
Hint: Composition under Art. 171 (5 categories); permanent body unlike VS; limited powers — cannot reject Money Bills, VS always prevails; delay of 4 months on ordinary bills; merits — revises hasty legislation, eminent persons as nominees; demerits — expensive, weak check, often house for defeated politicians; recommendation of First Administrative Reforms Commission (1968) — abolish VP in states with smaller VS; contemporary relevance given only 6 states retain it.
"The special provisions under Arts 371A to 371J are not special status but special protection." Discuss. (150 words)
Hint: Distinguish special status (like former Art. 370 — separate constitution, flag, limited Parliament power) from special protection (safeguarding customary law, regional equity, backward regions); 371A/371G protect tribal customary practices — Parliament cannot override without NLA consent; 371F protects Sikkim's merger terms; 371J protects backward region; these are all within India's constitutional framework; none of these grants sovereignty or separate law-making power to the state itself; distinction from Art. 370 which was truly "special status."
Critically examine the constitutional provisions relating to the Governor's role in state legislative process with special reference to Reserved Bills under Art. 200. (250 words)
Hint: Art. 200 — four options for Governor; Art. 201 — President's options on reserved bills; when Governor must reserve (Art. 200 proviso — HC powers); once VS repasses, Governor must assent — no second veto; but President not bound after repassage; controversy — Governors withholding assent for political reasons; Shamsher Singh principle — Governor acts on CoM advice; Punchhi Commission recommendation — Governor should give assent within 6 months; recent controversy — Punjab Governor 2023; need for clear constitutional guidelines.
The Supreme Court's December 2023 judgment upholding the abrogation of Art. 370 has significant implications for Indian federalism. Analyse. (250 words)
Hint: Art. 370 history — temporary provision for J&K's accession conditions; what it provided; 2019 Presidential Order and J&K Reorganization Act; SC bench — 5 judges, CJI DY Chandrachud; key holdings: J&K had no sovereignty; President's Rule + Art. 356 gave Parliament J&K legislature's powers; Art. 370 was transitional; implications — shows federal asymmetry can be reduced by Centre; concern — Parliament reduced a state to UT unilaterally; SC directed statehood restoration but no timeline binding; broader implications for special status of other states under Arts 371A-371J.
14. 15-Minute Revision Box
Must-Remember — State Legislature & Special Provisions
- Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh
- Bihar, Maharashtra, Karnataka
- J&K VP abolished in 2019
- Strength: 60–500 (Art. 170)
- Term: 5 years
- Age: 25 years
- Speaker removed by effective majority
- CoM responsible to VS (Art. 164(2))
- Max 1/3 of VS; Min 40 members (Art. 171)
- Term: 6 years; Permanent body
- Age: 30 years
- 1/3 retire every 2 years
- 5 categories: 1/3 local bodies, 1/12 graduates, 1/12 teachers, 1/3 VS members, 1/6 Governor
- VS resolution: special majority (2/3 present+voting + majority of total)
- Parliament: simple majority Act
- NOT a Constitutional Amendment
- Art. 370 — J&K (Abrogated Aug 2019; SC upheld Dec 2023)
- Art. 371 — Maharashtra & Gujarat (dev. boards)
- Art. 371A — Nagaland (customary law; NLA consent)
- Art. 371B — Assam (tribal MLA committee)
- Art. 371C — Manipur (Hill Area committee)
- Art. 371D/E — Andhra/Telangana (equitable treatment; Central Univ.)
- Art. 371F — Sikkim (old laws; merger 1975)
- Art. 371G — Mizoram (customary practices; MLA consent)
- Art. 371H — Arunachal (Governor's law & order discretion)
- Art. 371I — Goa (min 30 VS seats)
- Art. 371J — Karnataka (Hyderabad-Karnataka region; 98th Amdt 2012)
- Lapses: 6 weeks from VS reassembly
- D.C. Wadhwa 1987 — no re-promulgation
- Governor re-assent after VS repassage: must give assent
- President after repassage: not bound
